User Tools

Site Tools


networking:router:mikrotik_wireless

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
networking:router:mikrotik_wireless [2012/12/24 11:03]
gcooper
networking:router:mikrotik_wireless [2016/09/01 10:38] (current)
gcooper
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Mikrotik Wireless Configuration ====== ====== Mikrotik Wireless Configuration ======
 +
 +See also **[[networking:router:mikrotik_capsman|Mikrotik Controlled Access Point System Manager]]**
 +
 +**Station Modes**: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Wireless_Station_Modes
  
 ===== Sample Optimized Configuration ===== ===== Sample Optimized Configuration =====
 +
 +This guy suggested upgrading to V6 for better wireless throughput, then:
 +
 +<file>
 +/interface wireless
 +set 0 band=2ghz-b/g/n channel-width=20/40mhz-ht-above country=******* disabled=\
 +    no disconnect-timeout=5s distance=indoors frequency-mode=regulatory-domain \
 +    ht-amsdu-limit=0 ht-amsdu-threshold=0 ht-rxchains=0,1 ht-txchains=0,1 \
 +    l2mtu=2290 max-station-count=12 mode=ap-bridge preamble-mode=short \
 +    security-profile=WPA2 wireless-protocol=802.11
 +</file>
 +
 +===== Another Sample Configuration =====
 +
 +Comments:
 +
 +For some reason following settings improve throughput:
 +
 +<file>
 +enable-nstreme=yes enable-polling=yes
 +hw-protection-mode=cts-to-self hw-protection-threshold=2347 hw-retries=4
 +</file>
 +
 +I don't know why nStream should be enabled, but it was performed better with it than without it.  And most important was: 
 +
 +<file>
 +ht-amsdu-limit=256 ht-amsdu-threshold=256
 +</file>
 +
 +Decreacing AMSDU from 8192 increases throughput! I read opposite of this on many posts, but try it and you will see.
 +
  
 <file> <file>
networking/router/mikrotik_wireless.1356372203.txt.gz · Last modified: 2012/12/24 11:03 by gcooper